Milestones in Supreme Court History

An article outlining important U.S. Supreme Court decisions.
9 |
10 |
11 |

Marbury v. Madison was the first instance in which a law passed by Congress was declared unconstitutional. The decision greatly expanded the power of the Courtby establishing its right to overturn acts of Congress, a power not explicitly granted by the Constitution.
McCulloch v. Maryland upheld the right of Congress to create a Bank of the United States, ruling that it was a power implied but not enumerated by the Constitution.The case is significant because it advanced the doctrine of implied powers, or a loose construction of the Constitution. The Court, Chief Justice John Marshall wrote, would sanction laws reflecting “the letter and spirit” of the Constitution.
Dred Scott v. Sanford was a highly controversial case that intensified the national debate over slavery. The case involved Dred Scott, a slave, who was taken from a slavestate to a free territory. Scott filed a lawsuit claiming that because he had lived on free soil he was entitled to his freedom. Chief Justice Roger B. Taney disagreed, ruling that blacks were not citizens and therefore could not sue in Federal Court. Taneyfurther inflamed anti-slavery forces by declaring that Congress had no right to ban slavery from U.S. territories.
Plessy v. Ferguson was the infamous case that asserted that “equal but separate accommodations” for blacks on railroad cars didnot violate the “equal protection under the laws” clause of the 14th Amendment. By defending the constitutionality of racial segregation, the Court paved the way for the repressive Jim Crow laws of the south. The lone dissenter on the Court,Justice John Marshall Harlan, protested, “The thin disguise of ‘equal’ accommodations . . . will not mislead anyone.”
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka invalidated racial segregation in schools, and led to the unraveling of de jure segregation in all areas of public life. In the unanimous decision spearheaded by Chief Justice Earl Warren, the Court invalidated the Plessy ruling, declaring “in the field of public education, the doctrine of 'separate but equal' hasno place,” and contending that “separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.” Future Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall was one of the NAACP lawyers who successfully argued the case.
Roe v. Wade legalized abortion and is at the center of the current controversy between “Pro-Life” and “Pro-Choice” advocates.The Court ruled that a woman has the right to an abortion without interference from the government in the first trimester of pregnancy, contending that it is part of her “right to privacy.” The Court maintained that right to privacy is notabsolute, however, and granted states the right to intervene in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke imposed limitations on affirmative action to ensure that providing greater opportunities for minorities did not come at the expense of the rights of the majority. In other words, affirmative action was unfair if it lead to reverse discrimination. The case involved the University of Calif., Davis, Medical School and Allan Bakke, a white applicant who was rejected twice even though there were minority applicants admitted with significantly lower scores than his. A closely divided Court ruled that while race was a legitimate factor in school admissions, the use of rigid quotas was not permissible.
Grutter v. Bollinger upheld the University of Michigan Law School's consideration of race and ethnicity in admissions. In her majority opinion, Justice O'Connor said that the law school used a "highly individualized, holistic review of each applicant's file." Race, she said, was not used in a "mechanical way." Therefore, the university's program was consistent with the requirement of "individualized consideration" set in 1978's Bakke case. "In order to cultivate a set of leaders with legitimacy in the eyes of the citizenry, it is necessary that the path to leadership be visibly open to talented and qualified individuals of every race and ethnicity," O'Connor said. However, the court ruled that the University of Michigan's undergraduate admissions system, which awarded 20 points to black, Hispanic, and American-Indian applicants, was "nonindividualized, mechanical," and thus unconstitutional.
loading gif